In some countries, some people opine that it is better to use money for building rapid train railway lines while others think that the money is better to be used for bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view because of several reasons.
On the one side, rapid train is advantageous in reducing traffic jam because it has swift speed and special railway which make its passengers arrive earlier than they usually do. Therefore, spending money for creating more rapid trains railways will support more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that operate, the more likely for people to switch from their private transportation to rapid trains, which will then overcome the traffic congestion problem. However, because rapid train usually has expensive fare, the possibility for people to switch from their private vehicles will be low. Finally, traffic congestion problem will not be overcome by the existence of many rapid trains.
On the other side, existing public transportation such as Bus and MRT can also reduce traffic congestion problem because they have potential to make people switch from their own vehicles. By bettering its facilities and conditions, people will be interested to ride them instead of driving their own transportation. Moreover, current public transportation such as Bus and MRT usually have reasonable fares which make people to be willing to ride them. As a result, spending money for improving existing public transportation is better because it has bigger possibility in reducing traffic congestion.
In conclusion, using money for constructing new rapid train railways is great because it will support more rapid trains to operate which will result to the reduction of traffic jam. However, because it has more expensive fare compared to existing public transportation such as Bus and MRT, I completely agree that it is better to use the money for bettering current public transportation which has bigger possibility in reducing traffic jam.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make its passengers arrive earlier than they usually do. Therefore, spending mon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80957500991 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426332288401 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2550420931 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23916555207 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107123125832 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733362147261 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180753772353 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042745797774 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.