In several people, several people believe that it is better to use money for building new rapid train railway lines while others opine that the money should be used for bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view because of several reasons.
On the one hand, rapid train is beneficial in overcoming traffic congestion problem because it has special railway and operates in rapid speed which makes its passengers to arrive earlier than they usually do. Then, using money to build more rapid train railways will support more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that operate, the less traffic congestion will occur. However, even though has great potential in stopping traffic jam problem, rapid train basically has quite high fare which will make people reluctant to switch from their personal transportation.
On the other hand, public transportation also has potential in overcoming traffic jam problem. By bettering existing public transportation, people will feel more safe and comfortable in riding them, thus will make them to choose public transportation over their private vehicles. Moreover, because public transportation such as MRT and Bus usually have affordable fare, people will more likely to be willing to ride them after their quality have been improved. As a result, traffic congestion will be overcome and the money spent will not be wasted.
In conclusion, rapid train is great in overcoming traffic congestion problem because it has special railway and can operate in rapid speed. However, due to its high fare, people won't likely to switch from their personal vehicles. I completely agree that it is better to use money for bettering current public transportation because it has more affordable fare.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71081545078 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6866984136 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195889244535 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081537081232 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717978608529 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142921198898 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626094390948 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.