In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on construction new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe that money should be spent on improving public transport. discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Transportation modes has turned the whole world into a small village. Presently, in many countries some proportion of masses assert that advertising hefty amount of money must spend for the construction of new railway lines for fast train services in mega cities. By contrast, others say that money should be used for improving old transportation system.Here,i would like to account both the view points with my own perception.
There are manifold points to support the former view. First and foremost, construction of new railway lines for fast train services will definitely reduce the problem of traffic congestion. To illustrate, majority of people prefer to use their own vehicle so that they can reach at their destination on proper time and it enhance the problem of traffic which causes the number of accidents. Therefore, the use of fast train services is essential for the betterment of people's life.What is more, More fast trains is imperative for both environment and people. For example, a single train can take ample of people at one time.Beside this, use of more vehicle means more pollution.Hence, people can not only save their time but also improve the level of environment problems if large amount of money is spend for the construction of new railway lines. On the other side, people have conflicting views,
They think that, construction of new railway lines may put extra burden on administration. To be specific, government already pay a hefty amount of money on other services such as education, health problems, and many others which requires a lot of money. Therefore, government have to pay some money on existing public transport.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, there is a need to improve the old transport system. However, still I believe that the idea of new railway lines will definitely worthwhile for uplift the living standard of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
...for improving old transportation system.Here,i would like to account both the view p...
^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , i
...improving old transportation system.Here,i would like to account both the view poi...
^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...mproving old transportation system.Here,i would like to account both the view poi...
^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
...their destination on proper time and it enhance the problem of traffic which causes the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
...tial for the betterment of peoples life.What is more, More fast trains is imperative...
^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more, More fast trains is imperative for both environment and people. For example...
^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Beside
...in can take ample of people at one time.Beside this, use of more vehicle means more po...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...se of more vehicle means more pollution.Hence, people can not only save their time bu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...nt problems if large amount of money is spend for the construction of new railway lin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her side, people have conflicting views, They think that, construction of new rai...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18421052632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92203041956 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6104704176 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447734325542 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143391970102 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796075565255 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257971760813 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808114049978 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.