Transportation has changed the whole world into a small village. Some people believe that government should spent huge amount of money on railway line construction for quick transit between different places, while there are others who argue that it should be spent for improving other modes of transport. In my opinion, I believe that the money should be distributed between improvement of existing railway lines and construction of new railway lines respectively.
First and foremost, construction of new railway lines offers many advantages. Firstly, it would definitely reduce the traffic congestion. Many people, in these days are using their own vehicles to reach their destination in time, resulting in huge amount of traffic which then leads to accidents. Moreover, construction of railway lines also protects the environment from pollution. For example, a single train can handle ample of people at one time, which would reduce the vehicles on road and thus the environmental pollution.
Contrastingly, some argue that construction of new railway lines would be a huge burden to the administration. The authorities are already spending hefty amounts of money on education, health and public welfare and so I believe it would not be a burden to them to spend on issues that reduces traffic problem and pollution.
I conclude that there should be an improvement in the old transportation system but construction of new railway lines would aid in faster transport and it would help to reduce the accidents caused by huge traffic on the roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... For example, a single train can handle ample of people at one time, which would...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the administration. The authorities are already spending hefty amounts of money ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31174089069 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00130280355 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8682210909 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376610719386 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143978183863 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125971501718 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237568960416 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133257442943 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.