A persons worth now a days is judges according to material possessions and social status. Old fashioned values seems no longer i,portmanteaus.
Given the power and influence of super rich, it seems as if material wealth and social status are used to judge a person’s worth. I disagree with this opinion and believe that a persons’ trust worthiness can be determined based on old fashioned values.
Firstly, celebrities are either admired or envied solely based on their wealth and the position they hold during different social hierarchies.often, these are the people who show back to their friends, cheat their spouses and over indulge during parties in alcohol or drugs. They feel that by owning a massive mansion, driving an expensive car and by attending A- class parties, they have reached a level above old fashioned culture. However, the people who gossip on issues in celebrate magazines and celebrity blogs often tend to follow such trends.
On contrary, I believe that most of the people determine a persons’ trust based on old fashioned values such as trust, honour and kindness. Moreover, people are mostly concentrated on building lovely families, raising their children to be good citizens, being generous towards the downtrodden and protecting our communities from harm. We build our friendships and business partnership based on these basic values. Also, when our trust is abused or if not treated with care, we feel it as a violation for our relationship and tend to punish the wrongdoer correctly.
To sum up, it is indeed true that some people get to know a persons trust based on material possession and wealth. However, I believe that most of the common people estimate a persons trust worthiness based on his honour and kindness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d or envied solely based on their wealth and the position they hold during differ...
^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., being generous towards the downtrodden and protecting our communities from harm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18045112782 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81232156424 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4760982447 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.272727273 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158914149939 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667329932899 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826533478536 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112486384739 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899477217895 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.