Some people always do same things for their entire life, whereas some people tend to change according to the surroundings. Personally, I feel that change is necessary, but I would discuss both sides of the argument.
Some people love stability in their life, and they do not make any changes in their work, lifestyle and routine. They create a comfort zone around themselves in the work place and they do not step out of it. Due to this, there are some advantages like they get exposed to all the knowledge in particular area. They indeed, can supervise the subordinates due to their superiority in that area. It seems very good at that particular moment, but gradually the monotony will lead to boredom and eventually they can’t find any other opportunity to work upon.
On the other hand, some people tend to change themselves as per situation, which at first seems intimidating, but it can be handled easily if the person himself knows what he is doing. Such kind of people observe each and every thing in all the other departments equally and so they gain knowledge in every aspect at the workplace. In the later stages, the monotonous executives will be replaced by these candidates who can offer advice in any tough situation.
I conclude that, both the sides of argument has its own merits and demerits, but I personally feel that change in life is necessary and it helps us to tackle under any situation effectively. Moreover, change makes the life more interesting to live.
How do I post my answers
How do I post my answers
I like this
I like this
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, i feel, in particular, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85546875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65668367324 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7620526801 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228197940574 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860660406298 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104093940502 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148759771275 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104728420834 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.