Mobile phone is one of the important inventions that have brought people tremendous convenience and efficacy. Admittedly, if there is an overuse or misuse, it may lead to some social, medical and technical problems. However, the advantages far outweigh the demerits.
Mobiles have helped people all across the globe to stay in contact with each other, irrespective of the place they live in. Distance has now not become a barrier, indeed there is a sense of security with a gadget, with which you can stay in touch with your near and dear ones. phones are the only source of communication during natural calamities.
Secondly, mobile phones also provide us with facilities like messaging, camera and internet. So, they also serve as a good replacement for laptop. Through mobile phones, business transactions can also be done and family commitments can also be fulfilled while at work. Cellphones also have games, which can provide entertainment.
However, there are some medical issues related to overuse of cell phones. They emit infrared rays which directly affect the body part to which the rays are exposed. A research revealed that mobile phones can cause ear, eye and brain cancer. Overuse of mobiles takes away privacy and sometimes even piece of mind.
The technical problems associated with mobile phones is that the phone does not receive signal in all the parts of the world. However, with the advancement of technology, this is now not a major issue.
I conclude that mobile phones have both advantages and disadvantages. However, the merits outweigh the demerits that are caused by overuse of cellphone. One should have their own concern on their bodies, which could help them from the phone radiation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Phones
... in touch with your near and dear ones. phones are the only source of communication du...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16370106762 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63266796063 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7854924143 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3684210526 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264436582286 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075478477174 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636834827588 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136148386289 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520560626593 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.