the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four college library and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph depicts the number of books which were borrowed from different libraries in four distinct months. The pie chart illustrates the proportion of books in terms of genre.
The most striking feature to be observed is that the highest booked were borrowed from ryslip library and fiction books were more popular.
It can be vividly seen that the largest books were borrowed from ryslip and Sutton wood library at 250 to 300 per month in June. However, borrowing books from both these library were falling slowly and reached at 100 per month in August. After that it again following an increasing trend. The borrowing books from church mount and west caton library around 50 in June.After that it increased slightly and reached at 150 per month in September.
Turning to rest of description, in case of borrowing books of different categories, fiction had highest 43 percent followed by biography and self help books with 19,10 percent respectively. History and science books were equally reported with 14 percent. As far as comparison is concerned, in the June month ryslip library stood at the top but in the month of September borrowing books from Sutton wood library gain more prevalence compare to other libraries. Further, borrowing fiction books were three times more compare to other categories books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...portion of books in terms of genre. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this library' or 'these libraries'?
Suggestion: this library; these libraries
...une. However, borrowing books from both these library were falling slowly and reached at 100 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and reached at 100 per month in August. After that it again following an increasing t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...nd west caton library around 50 in June.After that it increased slightly and reached ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12442396313 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49812943675 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.907797119 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 7.06120827912 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412770317924 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182393493519 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10360706073 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298568515174 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794281491016 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.