Some peolpe believe that should be as considered the money for building of new railways to join the cities quickly. Whilts other hold the view that government should be spent the money for development of roads to covered shorter routes. I want to strongly support in second view, because to manage the short routes and areas, public transport is on of the best solution for that.
On the one hand, it is widely accepted that railways is comfortable for chepest and fastest travel in longest routes. Moreover, it would be helpful to development the business and economic sector of cities by the connection of railways line. Acccordingly, that have high capability in rail to carried the goods and passengers so it also cheaper than public transport. However, railways is the best way for a transport in a shorter time and cheaper cost. For instance, the an ordinary people of India they should be managed large number of money and time to reach the Gorakhapur to Sunaul by public transport, but in railways they can reach at the Gorakhapur in one third cost and time than public tranport.
On the other hand, however, someone disagree and argued that railways wouldn't be prominent vehicle for a transport in short routes. Basically, in the rural areas that have to much shorter route for travel and people arenot also surviving in single places. Eventhough, railways can not fulfilled the demand of ordinary people of local areas. For instance, my countries Nepal is landlord countries, 45% people are living in rural areas so in here that would be extremely difficult to terminate the need of the people of transport.
In conclusion, however that have no doubt railways is the best way to preserve the time and money on travel however, railways can not handle the need of ordinary people of travel in all sphere basically in landlord countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...t routes and areas, public transport is on of the best solution for that. On th...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the longest'.
Suggestion: in the longest
...fortable for chepest and fastest travel in longest routes. Moreover, it would be helpful t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'transport'.
Suggestion: transport
.... However, railways is the best way for a transport in a shorter time and cheaper cost. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...er time and cheaper cost. For instance, the an ordinary people of India they should be...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
... On the other hand, however, someone disagree and argued that railways wouldnt be pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...meone disagree and argued that railways wouldnt be prominent vehicle for a transport in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'transport'.
Suggestion: transport
...ilways wouldnt be prominent vehicle for a transport in short routes. Basically, in the rura...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'fulfil', 'fulfill'
Suggestion: fulfil; fulfill
...le places. Eventhough, railways can not fulfilled the demand of ordinary people of local ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, for instance, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9552715655 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57901300246 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479233226837 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4964465239 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.307692308 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301258858199 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110664749044 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636811119014 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186779433404 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610018314552 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.