It is true that there is an ongoing competency for a job position between young and old employee in many parts of the world. There are various negative effect that this create, but steps can definitely be taken to tackle this problem.
In my opinion, there are three main factors emerge along with the striving needs to be able to get a job in any organization. Firstly, younger personnel can easily be receptive to new experiences such as using up-to-date technology or thinking out of the box method which older personnels can not keep up with. Secondly, the element of age discrimination makes higher-in-age employee suffer more disadvantages when coping with deadlines or when being required to think creatively especially in design industry or other art related jobs. This can even cause further stress for those who work for a longer period in a company. Thirdly, by being involved in a whirlwind competency tornado, sometimes it can backfire, demotivation happens when those who are afraid of their age can not outdo other employees in work performance. For example, quitting is one of the worst solutions that employees can take, company might lose many experienced people which lead to higher cost in training for younger generations.
However this can definitely be improved. I believe that the change must start from the older employees themselves, who need to regularly upgrading their skills and abilities in order to keeping up with the working pace and other younger workers. Also, organization should divide the work proportionately and equally to all of staff members, not incline to any particular age group. At the same time, jobs which require experienced workers should be highly awarded. For example: qualified doctors who are in higher age group should be promoted to superiors and to be in charged of various training programs and orientation courses for younger trainees.
In conclusion, problems will still arise when the older generation has to strive for their standing with the young one, unless companies promise to continue treating fairly with their staff members, not rely on their ages and themselves also need to take steps to further become accustomed to the changing work environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...in training for younger generations. However this can definitely be improved. I beli...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ientation courses for younger trainees. In conclusion, problems will still arise...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18559556787 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79057517307 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595567867036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4156734051 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7857142857 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199521312016 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731526852111 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446675818135 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12388732299 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320887309232 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.