Many seniors today till have to compete with youngsters to seek jobs. While this trend results in some problems, we can mitigate by some interventions.
In terms of drawbacks, older competitors may cause some negative effects. Firstly, the surge in older applicants can dominate the significant number of vacancies in a fiercely competitive labour market today. Many students who graduate from universities every year have a thirst for jobs in order to make ends meet, however, they have to fiercely compete with older counterparts who have more experiences. Secondly, it is clear that younger employees have better adaptability than older ones, and therefore, if workforces are accounted for a major part by seniors, it probably leads to less flexibility and slow response to environmental changes, especially when breaking into a new market.
Nevertheless, this trend can be tackled in some ways, which can be implemented by governments and individuals. Firstly, governments should regulate unemployment rate to meet labour demand in their countries. Unless governments’ remedies are effective, there would be an increasing trend of crimes and poverty due to the high unemployment rate among youngsters. Secondly, companies’ boards should encourage youngsters to support older employees so that they can adapt better to changes instead of making cutbacks at their workforces. Perfect combinations between young people’s adaptabilities and the old’s experiences are proved to help companies to gain the best competitive edges.
In conclusion, while a working population is occupied with high-age those can lead to some disadvantages, I believe that we totally overcome the disadvantages by efforts of both governments and individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ng population is occupied with high-age those can lead to some disadvantages, I believe t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...disadvantages, I believe that we totally overcome the disadvantages by efforts of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67557251908 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2315173507 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648854961832 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5695180715 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233764217304 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787110682048 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540975242812 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139032047577 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585395550568 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.