One way to solve the problem of congestion is to increase the tax on private vehicles. Do the advantages of this solution outweigh its disadvantages?
In this day and age, transportation play a vital role in people’s lives. Many suggest that the government should increase the tax on personal vehicles to reduce the congestion. In this essay, I am going to discuss about both pros and cons of this trend and give my own opinion.
On the one hand, there is a main reason why I agree with this solution. The reason is that increasing the tax can solve the problem of pollution, which is the major concern in globlal. This is because the fewer people own car, the less negative effect to the environment. For example, the ozon layer is seriously damaged by the house gases and emission from vehicles. Besides, the government can use these taxes to improve the quality of public transportation such as bus or subway train.
On the other hand, despite the given opinion, there is a reason why this idea is not necessary. The reason relating to this is that when rising tax on private vehicles, people in middle class or even people in the poverty do not have chances to own a car or a motorbike. This is because each family has their financial plan, if they own a car, increasing tax can directly affect to their financial issue. As a result, not only the automobile industry but also the nation economy are influenced.
Taking everything into consideration, it is clear that many support the view that one way to solve congestion problems is increase the tax on private vehicles due to its benefits. However, in my perspective, I believe this is not an effective way for some countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of this trend and give my own opinion. On the one hand, there is a main reason ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portation such as bus or subway train. On the other hand, despite the given opi...
^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun support seems to be countable; consider using: 'many supports'.
Suggestion: many supports
...ng into consideration, it is clear that many support the view that one way to solve congesti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69372693727 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67398110883 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575645756458 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1394442633 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314659097911 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943745295354 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959497048225 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196672088885 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978290205261 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.