online communication is becoming more popular than face-to-face communication in many companies. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, in some interpreters, the usage of social media such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter in order to communicate can come to be people’s top priority. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this trend, I argue that these are outweighed by advantages.
On the one hand, there are a wide variety of drawbacks depending on online communication. To begin with, it is undeniable that communication through social media platforms can be a stumbling block to interpersonal skill development. As online communication could be a written form in some cases, which enables people to apply slang words or emoji to transfer messages to others. As a result, they are not able to properly convey what they need without using informal words and phrases when communicating face-to-face. Besides, internet communication could give rise to unexpected problems for companies because of the lack of high security, which can render information to leak out.
On the other hand, it seems to me that the benefits are more significant than such downsides. First of all, online communication can assist staff to convey information in the blink of an eye and more efficiently. The reason is that they can use shorthand and shortened versions of the words themselves and attach images, documents or videos as well, followed by enhancing work productivity. Moreover, communicating on the Internet assists businesses to put money aside. For example, in lieu of having long-haul flights to engage in meetings with different branches from the parts of the world, supervisors can create online meetings that allow all workers to attend.
In conclusion, it is my contention that the prevalence of online communication brings more benefits than drawbacks for firms.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32246376812 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12958548262 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0527919694 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267291063911 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870928470678 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543887328477 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155002738919 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466972808858 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.