Only long distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several year s time but they cause same amount of pollution So some people think that we should discourage non essential flights such as tourist travel rather than to limit the use of cars A

Modern lifestyle and the global trade have caused using higher number of aircrafts for travel compared the usage of them in the past. Given that notion, some believe that modern people should continue using airplanes even for short distances rather than traveling in private or public cars. However, I disagree with this perspective, believing that people should use cars for traveling short distances since they are emitting less amount of pollution.

To start with, aircrafts, most of which are giant, produce higher amount of pollution particles. They consume a hefty amount of fuel which are emitted to the atmosphere. For short distances, for example fewer than 200 kilometres, these airplanes are not fully occupied and they often travel with fewer than half of their full capacity. This contributes to producing higher amount of pollution than emitted from cars which are significantly smaller and would transport in their full passenger capacity.

Additionally, passenger vehicles have the option of hybrid fuel consumption, emitting less amount of carbon dioxide to the environment, not only because of this option but they are also more packed and smaller. Buses are the best means of transport for short distances and more environmentally friendly than aircrafts. Some of the public vehicles consume natural gas as their fuel which produces less amount of greenhouse gases. Furthermore, buses are usually travelled in their full passengers capacity, resulting in emission of less amount of pollution compared to aircrafts.

In conclusion, I think choosing cars, especially public vehicles, for traveling short distances sounds more environmentally friendly than using airplanes, since airplanes are considerably larger and not being full of passengers which bring about more pollution.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...nvironmentally friendly than aircrafts. Some of the public vehicles consume natural gas as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61313868613 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77757128305 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4157532237 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267534345148 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113695914218 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644381326701 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172862089354 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587281203919 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.