The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rendering a strict punishments on driving infringement is the merely way to enhance the safety on the road. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain the point of view of the issue and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the argument above, I personally agree to the assumptions which assumed that every driving contravention is supposed to be punished in a strict way and I do believe that by taking this action, the number of driving offences will drop significantly in later times. Moreover, I firmly consider that there are several efforts which are capable of being done. The government, firstly, is supposed to produce a distinctive law which focusing on an enormous forfeit which has to be paid if individuals contravene the traffic law. Secondly, if there is a person who did a contravention twice, their license will be considered as expired and they, additionally, have to pay for the fine.
Furthermore, I tend to think it will provide various positive impacts. It, first and foremost, is going to bestow a deterrent effect to all individuals who have done it. Second but not less crucial, it is apparent that it will decrease several accidents which happened previously. Last but not least, all pedestrians do not have to be anxious of becoming a victim which was caused by the people who contravene the traffic law.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that creating stricter punishments are needed to be done in order to produce an improved life for all people. Thus, in order to make it happen, all individuals have to observe all the traffic laws and every regulation which has been made by the bureaucrat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'punishment'?
Suggestion: punishment
Rendering a strict punishments on driving infringement is the merely w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a strict way" with adverb for "strict"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ontravention is supposed to be punished in a strict way and I do believe that by taking this ac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90559440559 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8978421066 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6443892911 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116768046336 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046287495332 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786472075081 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075164466909 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393618382097 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.