the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The countries are more and more vehicle that is moving in the street. As a result, people are able to meet dangerous. Therefore, there is a body of opinion that the best way to create road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving who make a mistake. In my view, I disagree with this due to it caused negative effects.
In particular, penalties of government currently about traffic violation almost ask for inhabitant pay money for this, hence if the government go on increasing punishments that means people have to pay more money. The result is people will feel the government is plundering them. Instead of this, management agencies need to encourage inhabitants that they should drive safer and care to others as well as their family. In addition, management central need to promulgate some law to restrict drunker who drive the car in the street.
Moreover, the important thing is people’s consciousness even for children. Indeed, if inhabitants have been educated consciousness, then traffic will be order, namely Taiwan, Thailand, Japan.
In conclusion, not always give strict punishments will be a good result. The government has many different ways to approach more effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ll be a good result. The government has many different ways to approach more effective.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 196.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20408163265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92643739356 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.79998787 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143604567015 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493607753603 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865906299555 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911678880396 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836424867006 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.