The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data
The graphs compare the estimated consumption of 4 types of food in the world and two different countries, namely China and India.
In general, it is clear that the proportion of food consumption of two countries was more different than the world average.
In particular, the percentage of processed food consumption in the world was highest, accounting for 41 percent, while that of vegetables and fruits consumption was 29 percent, and animal food consumption took up a quarter. However, the proportion of nuts and seeds consumption was just 4 percent.
Likewise, China used processed food was largest, with 39 percent. In addition, the figures for both vegetables and fruits, and nuts and seeds consumption of China stood at 32 percent and 19 percent respectively, which was larger than the world’s average proportion. In contrast, the percentage of animal food in China was the smallest, just 15 percent.
In India, the highest percentage was still processed food consumption, it is 39 percent. Meanwhile, a similar proportion of animal food and vegetables and fruits accounted for 27 percent and 23 percent, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ion of two countries was more different than the world average. In particular, the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ina was the smallest, just 15 percent. In India, the highest percentage was still...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, still, while, in addition, in contrast, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31666666667 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0972458893 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7652616738 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204480751629 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115163338454 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892681411909 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161496467627 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966089402816 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.