The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on
driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on
driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People Safety could be a major concern affecting human life. This resemble the importance of the restrict rules which should be followed to decrease the number of life lost because of car accidents. In this matter, I agree that the punishments on driving offenses could be the only way to approach that. This could be explained by two main reasons, the accident rate nowadays and in the past and how the people is taking seriously if there is a financial consequences.
The accident rate has been changed when it is compared before and after the technological era. For instance, the monitoring cameras in the highways and main roads have assisted safety centers to evaluate roads situation. Furthermore, the drivers have known that all roads are observed which make them more serious.Nowadays, surveillance cameras have made an improvement in road safety and decrease the car accidents.
The second reason that could reflects the effect of punishment, is the human nature when they are dealing with any financial deduction. Although, any person have the ability to follow the restrict rule in various situations, the money drawbacks could be a trigger for following the rules seriously. This differ from punishment using other methods, which could have less impact on most of the people. In this way, the financial consequences will have a huge impact on how the drivers deal with the road’ rules.
In summary, road safety is one of the major concern that need a strict actions to be made and this restrictions are the roads monitoring and the financial punishment. I totally agree that the only way to keep people’ life safe, is to be more restricted with anyone who uses roads and streets. In future, the way how the roads will be monitored might be different and more convenient for all of us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n life. This resemble the importance of the restrict rules which should be followed to decre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...aking seriously if there is a financial consequences. The accident rate has been changed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nowadays
...e observed which make them more serious.Nowadays, surveillance cameras have made an impr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 30, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'reflect'
Suggestion: reflect
...dents. The second reason that could reflects the effect of punishment, is the human ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 185, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., any person have the ability to follow the restrict rule in various situations, the money d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 72, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'action'?
Suggestion: action
...of the major concern that need a strict actions to be made and this restrictions are th...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 95, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...at need a strict actions to be made and this restrictions are the roads monitoring a...
^^^^
Line 10, column 294, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...with anyone who uses roads and streets. In future, the way how the roads will be monitore...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96636085627 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71952287963 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0302366762 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301935281995 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123179499151 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168961108 0.0667982634062 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243909741183 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207181158325 0.056905535591 364% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.