Its irrefutable fact that in modern era, the numbers of vehicles are constantly increasing and due tu that reason the number of accidents are growing rapidly. For improving the road safety some people thaink thai the strick punishment should be made for drivers.however I disagree with the given notion that drivers should be punishing because there are other several factors are reasonable for increasing risk on road such a poor conditions of road. In the following paragraph I intend to explore my views about it in depth.
To begin with, its undeniable fact that due to the less care of drivers many accidents take a plane on highway. Its highly seen that at night duty many drivers drive vehicles in out of speed. Moreover, the drunken driving also resulted my ride number of accidents on road. However, the only drivers are not reasonable for accidents. Because there are lot of natural problems are effective such as climate change. There are lots of examples supporting that due to the heavy rain or frog many accidents took place on highway. Hence, I personally believe that only drivers should not be punishable.
On the other hand, there tare lots of undeveloped countries where the poor condition of roads are mostly responsible for accidents so governments should improve the quality of road to reduce the risk on road. On the other hand, the all signals of road should be follow by all individuals and society as a reason the traffic problem will also downturn and as a result the safety will improve. Thus, there are alse may factors affect the higher risk on road rather than drivers.
In conclusion, I personally believe that including drivers less care alse there are may reason are responsible for risk at highway such a ice, heavy rain, and so on, while I think that including drivers punishment government also improve the road system and made all rules compulsory for drivers to follow during drivers a car or bike such a wearing helmets or seatbelt compulsory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'condition'?
Suggestion: condition
...for increasing risk on road such a poor conditions of road. In the following paragraph I i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to explore my views about it in depth. To begin with, its undeniable fact that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly drivers should not be punishable. On the other hand, there tare lots of un...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'followed'?
Suggestion: followed
...hand, the all signals of road should be follow by all individuals and society as a rea...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her risk on road rather than drivers. In conclusion, I personally believe that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...re responsible for risk at highway such a ice, heavy rain, and so on, while I thi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, may, moreover, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89614243323 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59879672535 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492581602374 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.2680489506 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200975403847 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643844434215 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742686765498 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128696802415 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506503724631 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.