The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences.
What extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believes that the most effective way to improve a safety standard of driving is implementing much stricter punishments for people who drives offencively. I agree to the certain extent however there are some definite issues to consider which will be further discussed in this essay.
The strong punishment could help a reduction rate of driving incidents for many reasons. First, the soft penalties combined with unstricted control of the officers could lead to a driver’s ignorance. Since if they break the rule, this recent punishment might not effect to their living or their status. For example, in some country, passing through the intersection without an allowment can be deal by paying a penalty fee which is only as equal as one meal’s cost. Accordingly, the stronger penalty can make people scare of breaking the rule leading to more self-conscious during driving. Moreover, the driver who receive the strong penalty can be an example for others avoiding the offences. A number of drivers who are punished from their driving could rise considerably in the first period of implementing this new policy however it would drop steadily from seeing the example cases of punishment and avoiding to be like that .
On the other hand, there are also any other ways which can be done for driving safe. First, the high standard of engineering in transportation and traffic signs could provide drivers a higher standard of driving. This is because the high standard of engineering design in road construction concerns more about driving safety factors including a slope, surface, and others. As a result, it is much better to drive in well-design roads helping people in easier driving. What is more, campaigns for safety in driving could be held and encourage people for better understanding safety factors when they use the road. Seeing that the campaign lets people realize how danger they have to face if they drive poorly, they might tend to be more cautious when they are on the road.
In conclusion, a strong punishment is not the only way to reduce an incidence rate in the road. However, in my opinion, I consider strictly implement in punishment as the most effective ways due to a scare from the punishment encourages people to follow the law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be further discussed in this essay. The strong punishment could help a reduc...
^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... rule, this recent punishment might not effect to their living or their status. For ex...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 916, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoiding being'.
Suggestion: avoiding being
...ing the example cases of punishment and avoiding to be like that . On the other hand, ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 940, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... punishment and avoiding to be like that . On the other hand, there are also a...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ishment and avoiding to be like that . On the other hand, there are also any ot...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re cautious when they are on the road. In conclusion, a strong punishment is no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06100795756 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73279911082 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519893899204 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5411297852 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.235294118 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261074075484 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872546870753 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730510054076 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172966055173 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557277153407 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.