The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic collision and other traffic-related accidents have been creeping up recently, which requires the government to seek a silver bullet to address. From my perspective, I am completely convinced by the idea that imposing stricter measures for driving offences is an ultimate way to enhance road safety.
On the one hand, stiffer penalties for committing driving offences are likely to result in road safety improvement. Indeed, prolonging the impounding period of the subject vehicle might hinder driving license holder from breaking the rules. This is because drivers fail to desire to witness their vehicles to be left under the heat if their vehicles are impounded, resulting in steering clear of reckless driving. Additionally, driving license revocation instead of suspension is another stricter fine that might increase road safety. The Phillippines, for instance, had levied this obligation for years, which contributes to a gradual decrease in the number of severe traffic jams.
On the other hand, alternatives for deterring drivers from violating the rules appear to be ineffective. The initial measure is to raise commuters’ awareness of the grave consequences of traffic jams on their lives. This measure, however, deems not to persuade drivers, especially those who are residing in low-income developing countries. Take Vietnam as a prime example, the number of road-related deaths is still on the rise although a variety of campaigns on road safety measures have been taken place annually. Another solution is to encourage road expansion to facilitate transports to commute conveniently. Nonetheless, this alternative might deteriorate head-on collisions once drivers fail to control the speed in an emergency case.
In conclusion, although there are a plethora of penalties to improve road safety for commuters; however, it is my firm conviction that imposing stiffer measures for driving violations is the most fruitful way towards road safety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00576062394 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0135027209 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198235667621 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672683176239 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748445488167 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135664499495 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525483203233 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.