In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use their money to improve public transport. What are the advantages of such solutions?
Traffic congestion in many cities around the world is getting worst due to more private cars used. Therefore, many believe that the government should increase taxes for those who own a private car and use the money for public transport improvement. This essay will discuss the positive and negative side in details.
Increasing taxes which car owner must pay would have positive effect for everyone. The heavy taxes would discourage car owners from using their cars because it would become expensive to drive and they begin to use public transportation instead. However, it can reduce traffic problems and pollution as well. For example, people in Indonesia prefer to use private car to commute due to efficiency and convenience than using public transport although travel by car take more time because of traffic congestion occurred everywhere.
On the other hand, taxing private vehicles heavily bring negative effects for society. People who lived in area which are not covered by proper public transport such as those who lived in rural area need to change mode of public transport because the route might not pass through that area. Hence, private car considered as the best option and if the tax raised significantly it will lead another problem for them. For example, people in Indonesia prefer to use private accommodation due to unavailable public transportation which pass their area, thus car chosen as the most convenient mode of transport.
In conclusion, charging private car owners heavily has its own benefits and drawbacks. People could travel with public transportation and reduce the traffic congestion. However, people who lived in uncovered proper mass transport would experience a big problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'getting the worst'.
Suggestion: getting the worst
...tion in many cities around the world is getting worst due to more private cars used. Therefor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31868131868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66327321015 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4914793823 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351055960118 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125646258102 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750375001771 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226521299303 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368042500258 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.