IN order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advs and disadvs of such a solution
Today, the traffic congestion is becoming more serious in many countries because of the sharp escalation in the number of personal cars. Therefore, many people suppose that applying heavy tax on these vehicle owners and upgrading public transports could deal with traffic issues while others believe this solution would negatively affect to national economy.
To begin with, the idea of high taxes would have a great impact on citizens. A prime suspect lies in if car prices increased significantly for the sake of taxes, there would be less people who could afford to pay for it. As a result, the number of cars would go down and problems with extremely long lines of cars in the rush hours could be solved. Furthermore, money made from taxes was used for improving public transportation, so that people would prefer more to commute by public automobiles such as buses and subways. The higher quality of those transports, the more preferences of using them and the more efficient in solving traffic problems. As such it can be claimed, increasing taxes might be highly effective in some ways through evidences which were indicated above, not only does it reduce the number of cars but it also raises people’s awareness about using public transports.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to argue that neither the nation’s economy nor the life quality of citizens may be harmed by the action of taxing private car owners. It means, when people did not purchase for such a high price of cars just because of taxes, many businessmen could not sell their products which costs more than two, three or even four times than the basic prices. More to the point, it would lead to the decline in economy of the whole country. In addition, when it comes to the life quality, escalating prices of cars makes some people who cannot purchase face with troubles. For instance, provided that a family who did not have wanted to go for a picnic, they would have to moving by shared transports and may have to continue to move from stations with tons of items for the picnic. Comparing to the others who own cars, everything would be easier, specifically in moving and carrying things. Hence, cars still are indispensable vehicle for many people in certain circumstances.
In conclusion, in spite of rising taxes for personal cars brings its own merits, governs should consider carefully before doing, coming along with a gradual and limited increase in case of enforcing this state.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y for the sake of taxes, there would be less people who could afford to pay for it. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93317422434 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56848040857 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565632458234 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4426770388 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1875 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193044395799 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620388716389 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575232406633 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115298300789 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541849481745 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.