Parents are often over-anxious to teach their children to speak. If children are “slow developers”, parents will often allow psychologists and schools to intervene and give their children speech therapy. Do you think children develop at different rates and so should be left to themselves to acquire skills, or is such intervention justified?
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some children suffer from speaking development ability affecting their parents feel anxious so much. Speech therapy is a problem solving offered for this case which can be undergone by psychologists and schools. In my opinion, this technique presents more beneficial than children are left to fix their own struggle to learn speaking skill about the side effect of their character growth.
Basically, children whom their capabilities of speaking skill are underrated can learn how to solve it individually without interferences by mature people since they have a capability to imitate and mimic the way of their peers’ speaking. In short time, their own version will be flowed naturally by combining friends’ way. For instance, kids striving to fix this problem will meet their friends who can speak well in playing ground. In this moment, the sufferers will know how to utter a word by seeing and hearing their friends’ pronunciation either incidentally or deliberately. Yet, is there an adverse effect this method? These children might become less confident to speak bravely in public because they are not sure whether the words are pronounced properly or not.
If these kids take part in speech therapy, this consequence will not happen. The reason is that a speech assistant will teach patients how to pronounce word by word by moving their tongue to create specific sounds. As an illustration, patients will be educated the difference sound between v and f. Hence, the listener will notice the kids say word few or view in a sentence. Although spending much time and requiring hard work, this method, i believe, will obtain a benefit emotionally for the sufferers, and their self-confidence will boost to talk to others.
In conclusion, the strength of speech therapy outweighs self-studied for children having obstacles in speaking ability by looking at the implications of these methods for children’s personally trait. It is advocated that parents should more aware about matters confronted by their children in terms of speaking ability , and directly get involved to fix them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to speak'.
Suggestion: to speak
...left to fix their own struggle to learn speaking skill about the side effect of their ch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'word by'.
Suggestion: word by
...nt will teach patients how to pronounce word by word by moving their tongue to create specific ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 443, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e and requiring hard work, this method, i believe, will obtain a benefit emotiona...
^
Line 13, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ir children in terms of speaking ability , and directly get involved to fix them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, incidentally, look, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33134328358 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9139199895 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3450093132 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326979701438 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103838202512 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725061434054 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209396981931 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613785195194 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.