Parents often given childen everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequence when they grow up?
In the threshold of the new era, a burgeoning number of people are concerned about children-related problems. While many people have varying views with regard to whether it is a good idea for parents to accommondate all of children’s requirement, my view is that it has a negative influence on offspring and there exits severals serious outcomes in the long run.
It is irrefutable that pampering children has indeed certain disadvantages. In this regard, parents frequently tend to look for and expect their children to have the life they didn’t in the past. This , nevertheless, would likely to become dangerous provied that they meet the needs of their children uncontrollably, raising the self–esteem in each young child. As the result, it is inevitable for children to pursue the self-centered way which lead to selfish obviously. Aside from that,the establishment of under-indulgence stemming from parents result in offsprings’ unconscious behaviours and weaken their ability to adapt to challenging environmental conditions without their parents. For instance, if children are enabled to over-use computer or tv, there would be indeliberately the ability to develop bad habits and even put younger people at risk by the less-than-desirable illness in terms of both physical and mental impairment such as living in virtual world, near-sightedness and shool violence.
In addition, the consequences of pampering offsprings is unavoidable in their later adulthood . The immediate outcome is that children gradually become to depend too much on their parents in regarding family finance, weakening their capabitity of self-reliance in the future. Even children will be able to embark on life as criminal path such as stealing, murdering when they grow up due to the shortage of their parents’ guidance. Accordingly, parents should give appropriate methods to educate their offsprings who are likely to make significant contribution to the development of whole country and society.
In conclusion, for reasons I have mentioned above, I suppose that under-indulgence have serious impact on both parents and their children, leading to consequences in the long term. And mothers and fathers should pamper their offsprings controllably. By doing so, children will grow up effectively and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: THERE_EXITS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exists'?
Suggestion: exists
...gative influence on offspring and there exits severals serious outcomes in the long r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok for and expect their children to have the life they didn't in the past. T...
^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... life they didn't in the past. This , nevertheless, would likely to become da...
^^
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ad to selfish obviously. Aside from that,the establishment of under-indulgence stemm...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1004, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g in virtual world, near-sightedness and shool violence. In addition, the conseq...
^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... is unavoidable in their later adulthood . The immediate outcome is that children ...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d too much on their parents in regarding family finance, weakening their capabiti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60227272727 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45171848456 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6318782295 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.466666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229258016056 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793638975217 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597780538786 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138799833551 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305479989825 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.