In the past, museums stored information about culture and history. However, nowadays this information can be found through the Internet, so there is no need for museums. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Public concern has arisen about whether the existence of museums should be encouraged as in this day and age, the Internet can adapt most people’s demand for information. From my perspective, museums can play another role in helping people gain knowledge instead of being removed.
The merits of museums in recent decades seem apparent. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that museums shoulder the official responsibility for information storage. More specifically, they are often authorized and operated by the government and reliable organizations, which proves the accuracy and honesty of provided information.
In the second place, although several websites are set up to help people get access to more knowledge, their initial purpose is mostly to earn profits from running advertisements. Therefore, data posed on these websites do not have an official organization to guarantee.
Above all, numerous museums not only function as information storages but also tourist destinations due to their architecture and scenery. To be more extract, removing all of them needs an efficient plan to use these facilities properly and convert the location into another structure with the same economic effection. As a result, it is unlikely a cost-saving and essential process as it seems to be.
It is tempting to argue that despite their social values, museums soon become a thing of the past owing to their uselessness and ineffectiveness. But further analysis makes it clear that seeing the real objects and discovering the past in person can never be replaced by visual graphics.
All things considered, I firmly believe that like other historic buildings, museums can always find their position in our modern world. Also, it is an alarm that museums should take some upgrade to adapt people’s demand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, as a result, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35664335664 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93191356788 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7942431167 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234761832105 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072473049464 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549597809517 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107942261558 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578894936295 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.