In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In this day and age, people tend to opt for preserving information on the internet instead of printed books. It is my firm belief that the upsides of this trend is more considerable than its downsides.

On the one hand, there are certain drawbacks of keeping knowledge online. To begin with, one might not be able to control the quality of the information that they encounter. Before a book is published, its contents are usually censored carefully. In contrast, information posted onto the internet is not always verified. Moreover, there is the problem of copyright infringement Knowledge on the Web could be re-uploaded illegally and shared without any royalties. For example, in Vietnam, people can easily read several copyrighted ebooks without having to pay any fee.

On the other hand, I personally believe that the positive points of posting knowledge on the internet are more significant. First, it is more convenient for people to access information. As long as they are connected to the net, they can gain access to a wealth of knowledge, regardless of their geographical location. In other words, one does not need to go to bookshops or libraries. Second, publishing expenses might be reduced. This is because there is no need to print out a large number of books. Also, without having to store and transport the books, a lot of money can be saved.

In conclusion, storing knowledge on the internet has several demerits. However, I personally think that the merits of saving information on the internet is weightier than keeping it in books.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s because there is no need to print out a large number of books. Also, without having to store an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04247104247 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8656973054 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7263461374 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.8235294118 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2352941176 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194427236818 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059435893982 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678636617487 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125249713569 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558212221896 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.