Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
It is obvious that all parents want their children live happy and enjoy life. Therefore, some buy a lot of toys for their kids. Personally, I think there are some benefits and drawback from this phenomenon.
There are some advantages when children have several toys. Firstly, toys can develop their brain and their creative. For example, the instrument toy like harmony, small guitar can suitable for kids who sensitives with sounds, they can find out their talent throughout the toys. Secondly, children can do exercise combine playing toys such as play a ball, ride bicycle, good for their health. Thirdly, toys can help children improve their concentrate and train their patient. According a research, playing lego make children more focus and creative. When a kid finds a piece of lego in a large piece, he must be patient and she can creative her favorite animal which don’t have in the guide book.
On the other hands, there are some disadvantages form this situation. It has bad effect on children focus when they own large of toys. A research of Hardvard University show that kids who have lot of toys will be boring with their toys, not focus for a long time and not interested when they have many toys. On the contrary, kids has less toys really enjoy their toys and creative the ways to paly with the toys. The reason is that kids who have many toys will not patient to discover and creative the ways to play with toys. Moreover, owning many toys make children not appreciate the toys so they will not eager to have the news.
In conclusion, there are some pros and corns when children are buying large of toys. Balance is the key, children can be own multiform toys so they can develope many skills thanks to toys. However parents should be consider carefully what kind of toys suitable for kids before make decision to buy them. Therefore it can reduce the bad effect when kids own many toys.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...dren focus when they own large of toys. A research of Hardvard University show that kids w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun toys is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ve many toys. On the contrary, kids has less toys really enjoy their toys and creati...
^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...an develope many skills thanks to toys. However parents should be consider carefully wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...anks to toys. However parents should be consider carefully what kind of toys suitable fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... kids before make decision to buy them. Therefore it can reduce the bad effect when kids ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72835820896 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26596462424 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486567164179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0203982928 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385350219007 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137278923625 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651639103593 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253248873017 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405987476899 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.