Some people claim that not enough of their waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of their waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.

It is evident that recycling is among the most efficient ways of maintaining a clean, waste-free environment. There is a notion that it should be legally obligatory for people to recycle, which I agree with to a certain extent as other measures also need to be employed in order to settle the problem.

On the one hand, enacting new laws would help a great deal with increasing the amount of waste recycled. Obviously, there are people who only act when they are bound to the law. Governments can impose regulations on the classification of garbage, which certainly facilitate the process of recycling. Different forms of punishment ranging from fines or community service to even imprisonment can be adopted depending on the severity of the offence.

On the other hand, government should do more than just legislating on recycling. Education needs to be regarded core to the resolution of the issue. For instance, children could be taught about the negative effects of domestic waste on the environment as well as the importance of recycling in lessening such adversity. The distribution of guidebooks on the classification and recycling of waste to every household can be similarly of help. In addition, another tactic that governments can use is to allocate more budget to the construction and operation of recycling units in different regions within a country, especially in major cities. As the facilities for recycling is improved, the process can be performed more easily and productively.

All in all, even though it is perhaps necessary to introduce new laws that regulate recycling, it is much more significant to deploy a number of different methods simultaneously.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1163201255 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3858428632 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223579525784 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758331464938 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03770361896 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120158306533 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498202924037 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.