In the past, people used to travel to see the difference from their home country. However, the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays. What are the causes of these similarities? Do you think that the advantages of this similarity outweigh the disadvantages?
similar natural and cultural spots could be seen globally. Many causes contribute to this phenomenon, and I believe the merits are more than its drawbacks.
There are several reasons why different places have similar scenery. Firstly, people who exploited these scenic spots may have similar appreciation standard, including those who believe tourists would appreciate high waterfalls as they do, building these places similarly. Secondly, the market of tourism depend on customers’ dominant preference, leading tourism offices to set sightseeing stands, telpher routes, ancient architectures and handicrafts stores to meet tourists’ demand. Lastly, decorating and equipping a place in a particular style could be more economical, including planting some pine trees on ground to make a place looks fuller, out of financial consideration.
From my perspective, the merits of alike scenes are more than the shortcomings. To begin with, similar scenery gives people opportunity to experience the world with low cost, benefiting those who are passionate about touring far but could not afford it. Nevertheless, even if they could feel they are sight-seeing in another country, they could not immerse themselves in the culture and history, losing the significance of traveling. another drawback is that some tourism-driven countries such as Thailand, their dominant economy would be affected if other places copy their styles and cultural scenery.
In conclusion, several things lead to the issue, and I assume the disadvantages of the alike scenery outweigh the advantage, for the industry would be damaged and tourists’ experience would be worsen
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similar
similar natural and cultural spots could be see...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57085020243 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81389624837 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 247.0 20.2975951904 1217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1376.0 106.682146367 1290% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 247.0 20.7667163134 1189% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 128.0 7.06120827912 1813% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237088694456 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237088694456 0.084324248473 281% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125798827554 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493511137324 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 128.3 13.0946893788 980% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -196.15 50.2224549098 -391% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 102.0 11.3001002004 903% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.51 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.0 8.58950901804 244% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.8 10.1190380762 996% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 10.7795591182 529% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.