People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less.
These days the youngsters are being provided with sugar drinks more than in the past. This essay will attempt to discuss the main reason behind over-consuming also some strategic solutions are explained to address such issues.
Today’s life has been changed a lot, one of which is producing plenty of sugar drinks related to the advancement in the production process. To some extent, scientists have been educated to develop sugary sodas These days the youngsters are being provided with sugar drinks more than in the past. This essay will attempt to discuss the main reason behind over-consuming also some strategic solutions are explained to address such issues.
Today’s life has been changed a lot, one of which is producing plenty of sugar drinks related to the advancement in the production process. To some extent, scientists have been educated to develop sugary sodas efficiently. As a matter of fact, such drinks serve enough energy for individuals, therefore, they become used to them recently. For instance, the ‘Life’ brand’s energy-drinks contain much more sugar than the permission limitation so, people not only have encouraged to buy them but also, they are being addicted to such energy-drinks. As a result, this drink is reported to affect the youngsters’ life considerably.
On the other hand, there are some solutions to tackle this issue. It is worth bearing in mind that the government have a responsibility to monitor the proportion of the ingredients in drinks such as sugar, protein, and carbohydrate. In more detail, today some research has done in Japan which is confessed that the private sectors have not met the minimum requirements and the extra profits are taking care of in these companies. Consequently, should the government set severe restrictions for the industries, people would indisputably experience a healthy lifestyle then safeguard the well-being of the next generation.
To sum up, despite the rational reason behind consuming more sugar-based drink which is based on the effectiveness of the production process, the government is responsible to take steps to handle this issue. Therefore, this department can mitigate all the concerns created by these sodas, for example, the decreasing trend of people’s lives in terms of health humanity because of over-consuming of sugar that can be solved by checking the percentage of ingredients in the drinks industries. As a matter of fact, such drinks serve enough energy for individuals, therefore, they become used to them recently. For instance, the ‘Life’ brand’s energy-drinks contain much more sugar than the permission limitation so, people not only have encouraged to buy them but also, they are being addicted to such energy-drinks. As a result, this drink is reported to affect the youngsters’ life considerably.
On the other hand, there are some solutions to tackle this issue. It is worth bearing in mind that the government have a responsibility to monitor the proportion of the ingredients in drinks such as sugar, protein, and carbohydrate. In more detail, today some research has done in Japan which is confessed that the private sectors have not met the minimum requirements and the extra profits are taking care of in these companies. Consequently, should the government set severe restrictions for the industries, people would indisputably experience a healthy lifestyle then safeguard the well-being of the next generation.
To sum up, despite the rational reason behind consuming more sugar-based drink which is based on the effectiveness of the production process, the government is responsible to take steps to handle this issue. Therefore, this department can mitigate all the concerns created by these sodas, for example, the decreasing trend of people’s lives in terms of health humanity because of over-consuming of sugar that can be solved by checking the percentage of ingredients in the drinks industries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 11
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Men do most of the high level jobs Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women What is your opinion on that 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 13.1623246493 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 94.0 41.998997996 224% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3336.0 1615.20841683 207% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 621.0 315.596192385 197% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37198067633 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.991980728 4.20363070211 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07793882522 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.29307568438 0.561755894193 52% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1024.2 506.74238477 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7608558202 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.44 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.84 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30251331787 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102643261388 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578041139698 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193731864715 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369127314446 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.