People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ability to amass money in colossal amounts is not a crime as it is a legal tender for purchasing varieties of valuables of interest. It is popular knowledge that sources and purposes of making money are diverse. Nevertheless, everybody belongs to a society in which they live and make their monetary wealth. Therefore, to propose ways in which people should handle and spend their wealth is essential.
Firstly, let me hasten to clarify that having prudent skills of keeping and managing money is admirable to all. Indeed one's ability to earn and keep money would be undoubtedly helpful in rainy days. The occurrence of both man-made and natural disasters may result in destruction of lives and properties. As a result, the surviving victims and their relatives will have to live in extreme hardship, and if there is abundance of money, foodstuffs and new properties could be purchased to make their lives comfortable. Thus, nobody will seek help from any relief organisations if they have money in abundance
In the same vein, people with enough money would not taste poverty anymore, and this comfort could trickle down to succeeding generations. As reported by the World Health Organisation in 2015 that hunger is one of the three leading debilitating human experiences with preponderance in developing countries, there is no doubt that having money in abundance could be a remedy.
On the contrary, for one to hoard money without giving to his or her society its due will only thwart the progression of such a society. Every society needs numerous monetary resources from its members to develop and be able to provide basic needs for its dwellers. Thus for people to be reluctant in paying their taxes for societal development is an attitude of greed and pre-historic nature. One best example is the situation in the under-developed countries where greed and corrupted practices of its members have resulted in widespread poverty, diseases, poor healthcare and educational services among others. In other words, societies survive because of the generosity of its members.
In sum, while it is good for people to make, keep and spend money for themselves, it is also important for them to ensure payment of their taxes for the common good and the development of their societies in which they live.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...and managing money is admirable to all. Indeed ones ability to earn and keep money wou...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...aging money is admirable to all. Indeed ones ability to earn and keep money would be...
^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o provide basic needs for its dwellers. Thus for people to be reluctant in paying th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...e of greed and pre-historic nature. One best example is the situation in the under-developed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, no doubt, as a result, in other words, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06578947368 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80518292568 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.421549744 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.3125 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179603550382 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574843289297 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414810749825 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962541627959 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02857826241 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.