People believe that unemployed people should be made to work for their welfare/benefit payments. Others, however, see this as cheap labor.
Discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages of making unemployed people take any job.
Do you believe that making unemployed people work is a good idea?
Some would argue that finding any job for unemployment brings obvious benefits especially to avoid them being criminals to earn money while training unskilled people needs a large budget to be allocated by the government. However, I believe that facilitating jobs for them is far better to encourage an individual to be financially independent.
One of the merits of making people go on work is to cut the number of crime rates in society. The common crimes in society such as pickpocketing and shoplifting are usually caused by unemployed people as a result of their poverty and want to get money instantly for fulfilling basic necessities. For example, the offenders of such crimes arrested in modern market Surabaya were being interrogated about their job, and they said that it was their permanent job for years. What are the consequences this? They are lack of special skill which can be used to work in a company or have own business as they only focus on committing crimes every day. Therefore, by facilitating them a workplace, they could shift mind and for further advantage, they could be aware of how important to have a technical competence as an employee to stop remaining in the bottom competition as blue-collar workers.
On the other hand, skill training for uneducated people uses the extra fund as it lasts for a long time and needs qualified trainers. Looking from their capability, the training should be done step by step in order to create long-term employees who are capable to compete with other job seekers. For example, the government in Canada provides 10,000 dollars for one million Canadians at ages 18-29 years who are not education nor employed to make them eligible with technology. This is accounted to be successful in the next three years training intensively to reduce the number jobless and increase productivity.
In conclusion, even though the cost needed to hone their skill is relatively high, it is truly suggested to adopt this policy for stopping crime rates motivated by lack of personal income and reduce the number of unemployed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...t to get money instantly for fulfilling basic necessities. For example, the offenders of such cri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 890, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tom competition as blue-collar workers. On the other hand, skill training for un...
^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs qualified" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'qualifiing' or 'to be qualified'.
Suggestion: qualifiing; to be qualified
...d as it lasts for a long time and needs qualified trainers. Looking from their capability...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested adopting'.
Suggestion: suggested adopting
...r skill is relatively high, it is truly suggested to adopt this policy for stopping crime rates mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01734104046 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81202436662 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592485549133 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4686644005 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.538461538 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256781472443 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886945244923 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505977518196 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144951944829 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667177979404 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.