In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of food eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The need for imported food is mainly caused from the people preferences to eat diverse meals apart from their eating habits so that it makes consumers can enjoy tasty one which does not exist in their host country, and it likely increases creativity for making a profit. However, from this activity, severe problems could emerge such as the high demanding of fossil fuels and harming local restaurants.
Admittedly, weather conditions cannot prevent people to taste yields from other countries, and by tasting many local cuisines it will make such creative businesses to gain high output. When a lot of fruits are already available in the store, overseas fruit can be eaten by consumers with no moving from their countries. The success of this leads to the presence of International chain restaurant so that after being tasted local people can recognize the ingredients and special techniques for making the food which sometimes can be an inspiration for business makers. For example, People in tropics can taste sweet mangos and grapes from European countries as these fruits have been already transported and even reached high demanding from societies. In a similar way, Pizza outlets have been expanded in Indonesia causing one of the food innovators creating a new pizza by using local seasoning called ‘pecel and rujak’. After being established, the restaurant attracts a lot of customers and chains in the cities of Indonesia. However, much traveling time from where it is grown reduces the nutritional value from its fruits and the more and more local recipes will lose popularity due to the new eating habits of citizens.
On the other hand, import processes must a lot of fuel for transportation as it needs thousands of kilometers for reaching their marketplaces. If people allocate more fuel in such sector, it means that they have to cut the use of electricity and traveling for important purposes which are more crucial to fulfilling. To illustrate this, spending billions of tones fuel leads to rotating blackouts for several regions, and it is estimated that each person only has 3 times of opportunities to visit other regions. What is the impact of this? Due to the high reliance on electricity, many workplaces do not run their production reducing of GDP and products. Also, several jobs and emergency situations are demanding to transport very often every day, if they should be limited, it such breaks people right. Therefore, the high use of fuel might lead the sources depleting quickly overestimation.
In conclusion, although the presence of different meals gives obvious benefits for citizens, the result of this will be severely the existed problems. Also, to allow this habit to happens, it would be increase consumerism for citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... reached high demanding from societies. In a similar way, Pizza outlets have been expanded in In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1049, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ns in the cities of Indonesia. However, much traveling time from where it is grown r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 965.302439024 241% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 450.0 196.424390244 229% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17111111111 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 3.73543355544 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77144968082 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 106.607317073 237% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562222222222 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 283.868780488 252% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0869220283 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.277777778 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254427490135 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739578024024 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046989793546 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150950470135 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647369272946 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 40.7170731707 332% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.