Nowadays, some authorities make varieties in prices of some products which result in the decrement of the costs to give an access to poor societies for cheaper products. This trend leads people to save their income and reduction in expenditures. Thus, this process has a number of merits which outweigh its demerits.
With regard to positive sides, this act offer benefits to impoverished population. In this case, everybody can purchase what they want and all commodities will be tangible for them. As a result, they can balance their outcomes. For instance, people with lower incomes will be able to manage their profits with paying less than past. Secondly, this tendency has also upsides for citizens because it rejects the obstacles on their spending power. In addition, some shops and malls can acquire benefits from this situation due to rising number of being sold goods. Regarding crucial benefits, parents can meet their children’s requires. From my perspective, this the important thought why the positive sides of this trend exceed it negatives.
On the other hand, in not so far future, people maybe suffer from the shortage of products because excessive sales of the same goods. Although this process maybe happen, government should encourage manufactures to increase production levels such as giving financial help to them. Furthermore, another disturbing factor that the quality of commodities will be decreased by some factories in order to obtain more revenue.
In conclusion, as I mentioned above, there are various numbers of pros. In addition, however, some people are in the opinion that this acts has different corns, to my mind they cannot tend to outweigh the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...t in the decrement of the costs to give an access to poor societies for cheaper products....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y cannot tend to outweigh the benefits.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27573529412 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69903775866 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0368520557 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128160307278 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408483647282 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331043505825 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832102279655 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298115367337 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.