People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn about the natural world.
In modern civilization, the issue of how the natural world influenced profoundly on human lives has become a controversy among generations. It is supposed by some that people do not acknowledge the significance of nature. Fortunately, however, there involves some alternative approaches to expand and enlarge their understanding genuinely.
Initially, the primary reason why people do not appreciate the value of the natural world is the disappearance of traditional ways of life. Considering the works such as farming, hunting or fishing now made up a moderate number of occupations in the workforce almost all countries. Those are derived from the advances in technology which makes the service industry progressively flourishing. Therefore, people prefer working in a closed environment supporting by convenient and high-tech devices rather than heavy and manual jobs outdoors. Besides, not only the lack of outdoor jobs could cause the absence of the natural world, but the disappearance of the festival also aligned with the natural world such as spring or harvest celebration nowadays. This could be explained by the fact that those celebrations provide a link to our roots continuing only in the hands of an aging population to recall the achievements and combine with cultural perspective whilst younger generations are addicted to the electronic media instead.
Notwithstanding, people have numerous chances to learn about the natural world in three distinctive methods. First and foremost, getting involved in various voluntary social works, carrying out environmentally friendly tasks like planting trees or gathering rubbishes seem to be essential to maintain the natural world. Moreover, schools should introduce nature studies and environmental science in the educational system aiming to encourage youngsters to comprehend thoroughly the natural world. Eventually, it is more beneficial to spread out nature documentaries on TV, the internet, and other social media platforms which stimulate a revival of interest in the world around us. Thus, people would be informed and understood about the life on the planet and the need to combat environmental degradation particularly.
All of this being indicated, although there are fundamental reasons why people gain little public understanding of the natural world, it can be proposed that there encompasses a multitude of ways to overcome this lack of knowledge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64207650273 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17464353141 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620218579235 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5723440098 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43551363041 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12877334421 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109479217232 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248199992642 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647554370715 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.