People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?
It is true that living in big cities has become an increasingly popular trend nowadays. Several problems have resulted from this tendency and governments should tackle these by encouraging people move to suburban areas.
Living in larges cities, people have to face up to two main challenges. First, it is difficult for job seekers to have a job due to fierce competition in the job market. If there are not enough jobs for people, the likely hood of citizens being unemployed is considerably high. This results in wastage of human resources. Second, pollution has become increasingly more prevalent in the metropolises. Due to increase in number of vehicles over the years, the city roads witness frequent traffic congestions, but above the vehicles emitting pollutants are affecting environment badly. Besides, waste from manufacturing or chemical processes in industries contributes to water pollution as well as soil pollution, which carries potential health risks to the citizens.
There are variety of reasons why the official authorities should encourage pp live in smaller towns. One reason is that efficiently allocating the workforce of nation. Human resources would be allocated to decrease the unemployment rate in big cities and raise labor productivity, which contributes to increase economic growth. Furthermore, should government invests to develop infrastructure in a residential area, if the number of people moved to settle in there increases. Consequently, the quality of inhabitants’ life would be improved. For example, a school is built in remote area would improve the literacy rate of children because they are exposed to better educational programs.
In conclusion, the citizens of big cities can face with some challenge. I would argue that government should allocate people to smaller areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51245551601 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09182018966 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0409258505 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1176470588 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290380166631 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834764115913 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110411342997 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203430657474 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100831397244 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.