Living in big cities is becoming a challenging trend for some people. Those living in enormous urban areas tend to confront numerous issues in regular day to day existence. This essay will explain what kind of problems they must face and give some reasons why the government should recommend those people to migrate to smaller towns.
There are two underlying problems people have to face when they decide to live in big cities. First is the difficulties in job seeking resulted from extreamly limited employment chances. People in big cities must compete with other job seekers in a same time. This phenomenon seems to be a jungle law which means that the stronger will be the winner. Morover, it becomes worse when they do not have high qualifications to apply in a particular working sector. The other problem is pollution which also leads some derivative effects for people in big cities. They are exposed by huge amount of carbon emissions from vehicles and industries and have probabilities to suffer respiratory diseaseas. These two main problems determine their lives.
In order to deal with those issues, encouraging people to move to regional cities becomes a nessesity and should be done by the government. If partial populations of big cities move to smaller cities, it can benefit both environment and those citizens. It can decrease the use of private vehicles which means that it will also has positive relation to air pollution. In addition, regarding the moving people, they can afford cheap accomodations, gain better air conditions, and expand their employment opportunities. These are the reasons why government should push those people to move.
In conclusion, people living in big cities have difficulties in looking for jobs and gaining fresh air. These are the reasons why those people should move to regional cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... vehicles which means that it will also has positive relation to air pollution. In ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1561461794 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.709269225 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541528239203 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6895978791 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331609685331 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107676452899 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973835812063 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22238700591 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430291494717 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.