The bar graph provides the information about the earnings of five different digital game sold in international market between 2000 and 2006 in billion of dollars.
Overall, there were upward trends in the sales of handheld, online, and mobile phone games, while it saw a decline pattern on the sales of console game. Another striking point is that handheld games was the highest sales over period.
With regards handheld games, the figures was about 10 billion dollars in the beginning and then increased gradually until 2004 at about 16 billion dollars. The earnings then remained constant in the next year before having a sharp increase to finish at just under 18 billion dollars in 2006. In contrast, the sales of console game had a gradual drop during period. Starting at about 6 billion dollars in 2000, the figures continued to decline steadily year by year and finished at 3 billion dollar in 2006.
The income from the sales of mobile phone had almost same with online games. Although there was no sales of mobile games in the two beginning years, it then shared the equal earnings with online games at about 2 billion dollars in 2002 and 4 billion dollars in 2004 . These two figures continued to rise and finished at 7 billion dollars (mobile phone games) and 9 billion dollars (online games) in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ational market between 2000 and 2006 in billion of dollars. Overall, there were upwa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole game. Another striking point is that handheld games was the highest sales ove...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mobile games in the two beginning years, it then shared the equal earnings with o...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... online games at about 2 billion dollars in 2002 and 4 billion dollars in 2004 . ...
^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s in 2002 and 4 billion dollars in 2004 . These two figures continued to rise and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84888888889 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31338080613 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4806444852 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346373974674 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153079616502 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880123512611 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229000781456 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771133757038 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.