People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?

Nowadays, it is a fact that there are a variety of issues residents populating in big cities have to suffer in their daily life. In this essay, I will discuss some of these problems and some solutions governments should take to promote citizens to change their home to other towns before giving a reasoned conclusion.

Let’s begin by looking at some problems people have to cope when living in big cities. One of the major issues is that environmental pollution has negative impacts on human health. Industrialized cities have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of factories and companies, which leads to the increasing emission of carbon dioxide in the environment and harming the health of citizens. Another issue is that people without qualifications always face unemployment. This is because companies always tend to choose seniors rather than juniors who lack related certifications. For example, my high school friend has decided to find a part-time job because of his low level of qualifications.

However, to deal with these problems, governments should take some measures to encourage citizens to move away from major cities. Firstly, governments should move some universities, hospitals and companies to neighbouring towns, which leads to the movement of staffs and their family members. Secondly, road and accommodation systems should be constructed by governments and authorities to meet the essential needs of residents. Basic conditions becoming more convenient would attract more people, particularly workers with a low level of salary. As a result, workers are likely to afford their accommodation on remote outskirts with only a part of the spending on buying a small apartment in the city centre.

In conclusion, citizens will face health and individual problems if they go on living in big cities and some measures should be taken by governments to tackle these issues. In my perspective, these problems will be worse unless governments and individuals join hands to address.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37223974763 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03599859425 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1725107513 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.533333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279602161212 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823249508787 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668636647972 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163154117848 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419958188156 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.