It is commonly known that young people are occupied major responsibility for the development of all fields, particularly modern technology. I completely agree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my opinion with some of the reasons and examples.
One of the reasons why I agree with this idea is that young people tend to be a future generation for all countries over the world. It is a fact that all countries are investing a numerous amount of money for such fields as education and the health of youngers. What I mean by this is that pupils and students are being carefully looked after for the future of nations. In addition, technology companies’ employers always want to bring younger people into their company. It is because of the higher productivity than old people.
Another reason making the younger generation become more important for the development of technology lies their intelligent and dynamic. Take a smartphone is a good example. Younger people take only a small amount of time to use almost functions of a smartphone compared to even a few days for older people to make a call successfully. That is to say, youngers have special abilities to access technology. What’s more, young people always tend to be new things which are most important in the researches, particularly technology.
In conclusion, it is a common belief that the main responsibility for modern technological progress is in the youngers’ hands. It is not too much to say that young people are most important in the world’s development, not only the field of technology. In my perspective, governments should take the necessary steps to develop this generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s essay, I will support my opinion with some of the reasons and examples. One of the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09352517986 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10921235856 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1461410524 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181257570091 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620896311965 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692326755711 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11447382347 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207383065209 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.