The younger generation is mainly responsible for the latest technological developments. How far do you agree?
Over the last century technology has reached to an alarming rate in the speed of development. The active contribution of the young to this process accelerates the speed of improvement. The role of the youth is predominantly considered as a main factor of this action. Why youthful part of the population is more accountable for can be explained in different manners.
First and foremost, over the whole world almost all countries are paying attention to their young generation via providing them with a wide variety of opportunities that open up an avenue to show off. Hence, the role of the youth is visible in every dominant domains of life especially in technology. To take an example of companies who tend to hire young employees rather than elder ones. The rational behind this can be explained like that the juveniles are more active and have a great capacity of understanding which is necessary for development.
Secondly, it is also an unavoidable fact that the young generation is more active in not only its development but also the usage of technology. To be more precise, the progenies are completely engaged in technology. Moreover they enjoy learning and keeping In touch with technology. Therefore when they are working on technology they work with all power because of job satisfaction. To illustrate, no matter how hard you try to succeed in job that you are not gratified, you will not acquire achievements.
All things considered, it is supposed to be admitted that the young generation has contributed a lot to the developments of technology. As far as I am concerned that without the young the technology would not have never reached to such rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be explained in different manners. First and foremost, over the whole world...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...s are completely engaged in technology. Moreover they enjoy learning and keeping In tou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpletely engaged in technology. Moreover they enjoy learning and keeping In touch...
^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...g and keeping In touch with technology. Therefore when they are working on technology the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, you will not acquire achievements. All things considered, it is supposed to...
^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... lot to the developments of technology. As far as I am concerned that without the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00714285714 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0221208258 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8288513863 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124381081839 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366613668212 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380743974543 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740347468452 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256006244923 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.