People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Continuous transformations are an essential part of human’s life but some people feel reluctant about introducing changes into their pattern of living. However, alteration of the habitual lifestyle can provoke the pernicious and destructive consequences. This essay will discuss the main problem associated with this phenomenon and propose some possible solutions to avoid them.
To begin with, the attitude of adjusting to environmental conditions is sure to lead to developing the custom of tolerating which eliminates the possibility of bringing any modifications to the familiar routine. The main hazard of such a position is that a person rejects all potential opportunities provided by the surrounding, which brings artificial limitations to the life. For example, according to the book «Seize the hour» individuals who are prone to prevent themselves from changes are almost certain to be dissatisfied with the life due to missed chances. Thus, neglecting changes can negatively impact the degree of satisfaction with life as a person exists in a self-made bubble rejecting any forms of external interference.
Nevertheless, several options exist to overcome the mentioned obstacle consisting of the unwillingness to go beyond the common mode of life. A person's lifetime is full of unpredictable and challenging occasions that may drive to a radical transformation of the outlook towards the world bringing the true happiness and contentment. People with such a trouble should try new things overstepping the interior discomfort gradually becoming more pleased with liberating themselves from the box and encountering challenges. For instance, according to psychologist Brenda Milner a direct relationship is observed between the desire to experiment with life opportunities and the level of fulfilment. Thereby, a person should constantly discover new aspects of life in order to experience the pleasure of the existence.
Summing up, the aspiration for stability is understandable phenomenon but such an approach is sure to result in wasted potential. Therefore, people are to learn to risk to prevent stagnation both in life and mindset especially in consideration of the idea that life circumstances will not remain stable for good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...to go beyond the common mode of life. A persons lifetime is full of unpredictable and c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... according to psychologist Brenda Milner a direct relationship is observed betwee...
^^
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re to experiment with life opportunities and the level of fulfilment. Thereby, a ...
^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risk preventing'.
Suggestion: risk preventing
...tial. Therefore, people are to learn to risk to prevent stagnation both in life and mindset esp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Therefore, people are to learn to risk to prevent stagnation both in life and m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64601769912 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31247290478 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3977121226 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.714285714 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111714182434 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371875144346 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273330549854 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695342370557 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325459955399 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.