Some people believe that the best way to learn English is to study with native teachers.
What do you think about this opinion?
Since the need to learn different languages appears people have been debating about who more professional teacher native speaker or someone who studied the language for many years. An opinion exists that the native owners of the language are the most qualified trainers.I am convinced that people who know the language from birth are better pedagogues than others due to the reason marked herein after.
Firstly, compare with those who studied the language, its true speakers do not have a foreign accent. If we listen to someone who taught the language at university, we will hear the accent of the country where he comes from. Often accent which for us sounds acceptable will confuse native citizens for they will not understand anything. For example, according to statistics provided in the internet poll, majority of participants say that the foreign accent is hard to understand. Thus, foreign teacher will teach students not only what they should say but also how.
Secondly, the native teacher speaks the language from birth and knows some of its features. Such person is always aware of language changes because they contact with other native speakers and for them language is not something that they should learn. Native pedagogues may know the techniques and turns of speech that are used only on the streets. For instance, my friend from England every time we talk uses slang that i do not understand. Hence, some jargon will be understandable only to a person who uses the language from birth.
To conclude, for me native teachers better than common teachers owning to the fact that they can teach learners how to speak on the street language and with the right accent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...appears people have been debating about who more professional teacher native speake...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...anguage are the most qualified trainers.I am convinced that people who know the l...
^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only what they should say but also how. Secondly, the native teacher speaks the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...something that they should learn. Native pedagogues may know the techniques and t...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. For instance, my friend from England every time we talk uses slang that i do...
^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... friend from England every time we talk uses slang that i do not understand. Hen...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nd every time we talk uses slang that i do not understand. Hence, some jargon w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01779359431 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41202918278 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3959092396 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168707942675 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652156539126 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462976696375 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110722754965 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266477691899 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.