People nowadays do not recycle. What are the causes and effects of it?
Currently, the practice of not recycling is certainly a topical issue as so many nations are seeing this pattern. From my perspective, there are two main causes and two key impacts, which I will outline now.
First of all, the main cause is probably the inconvenience that people realize when recycling. For example, the recycling pick-up points are not effortlessly accessible from where they live, so homeowners have to walk or drive to these places, which is time-consuming. The other factor that brings about the situation is that the public believes that there is no point in recycling, for it makes no difference to the environment and has no immediate outcome. Gradually, the activity seems to be a low priority in their life, making them always forget to recycle.
Therefore, the effects of not recycling can be quite devastating. For one thing, it could create a detrimental impact on the environment. Due to the increasing amounts of garbage by just being thrown away, landfills are taking vast space and seas are strewn with litter. Consequently, trash will pile up and release tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, thereby forming the greenhouse effect and leading to global warming. The other adverse consequence that could occur is unemployment. To clarify, the recycling industry employs thousands of people, and if we do not recycle, those jobs will disappear, leaving a great number of individuals unemployed.
In conclusion, the causes of this phenomenon are primarily to do with the lack of places to recycle and the awareness of the public to recycling; the effects involve the damage to the environment and the employment. Hence, it is recommended that policymakers should initiate a curbside programme to improve the recycling rates of residents. For example, they could put more separate bins with a single image for a type of waste material on the pavements to make it simple to segregate. The other remedy is that governments can launch some campaigns to introduce the benefits of recycling through social media and television so that everyone could see the positive side of doing so.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, first of all, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22189349112 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91800730633 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618343195266 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4502001476 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218028306677 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644165834818 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663457719192 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121507394675 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462059246753 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.