The maintenance of outdated buildings has been highlighted as an emerging issue, raising many questions of its necessity. Given the suggestion that old buildings should be replaced by modern ones, I partially agree.
Admittedly, the upkeep of old constructions could bestow positive benefits. In many nations, especially culturally rich ones, religion beliefs, customs and original ancient architectural styles are mainly manifested through old constructions. If these historically and culturally significant old sites were demolished, it would be the utter rejection of national culture. Besides, old buildings’ could be utilized as tourism spots due to their cultural importance. For example, Vietnamese tourism department has undertaken initiatives, maintaining and renovating the old harbors and surrounding feudal style houses from 17 century, attracting millions of visitors, feeding into increased national revenues.
However, it is true that some old buildings should be destroyed for modernization. Specifically, because outdated constructions are designed and installed with less advanced materials and architectural technologies than modern ones, they could be susceptible to deterioration though time, making dilapidation or collapse inevitable products and raising safety problems. For instance, death casualties in the infamous Japanese earthquake disaster in 2011 mainly stemmed from the old buildings’ collapse with concrete cracks falling onto civilians, which has been addressed by Japanese disaster relief agency by setting up modern buildings with special foundations with compressed air in order that homes levitate when the earth shake.
In conclusion, I believe that only old constructions with deteriorated structures which could pose as a safety menace to civilians should be demolished while those with cultural significance could be maintained and retrofitted. Additionally, it is governments’ responsibility to decide on which old sites should be removed for the ultimate long-term interests of the national citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...surrounding feudal style houses from 17 century, attracting millions of visitors, feedi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21254355401 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36441417484 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644599303136 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.1376763932 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.583333333 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187117870801 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838013837016 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583991275404 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127437254683 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232845737071 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.03 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.