People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes and solutions?
In these days, people’s safety has aroused a host of discussions. It is argued by some that there is an increase worry about their safeness not only at their private place, but also in the external environment. There are a variety of rational explanations of this problem in tandem with viable solutions to cope with it.
There are two culprits leading to the concern among residents. Firstly, in terms of food, there is a decrease in the sanitary standard of food, which people have been daily consuming. Vietnam is a case in a point. The quality of food likely out of control of the government since there is still the presence of a vast host of stale and expired foods complimented by addictiveness that are sold in the market normally. Secondly, a rise in traffic accidents is another people’s worry. If people are commuters, their lives would be put in danger so they worry about themselves immensely. However, when at home, they can not put themselves at ease since their beloved ones’ lives could be in jeopardy at that time.
Nevertheless, the problem can be remedied, provided that some following preparatory steps are taken. First and foremost, the government should take into account a number of strict laws to restrict the floating of dirty foods in the market. Only when there is a decline in the harmful foods can people feel safe on their daily life. In addition, the government also should prioritize expenditure on enhancing the quality of public facilities to curb the number of accidents. Simultaneously, inhabitants need to protect themselves carefully such as not driving when being drunk or wearing helmets when commuting.
In conclusion, there are manifold reasons for the notion and some holistic approaches should be adopted. Only when concerted endeavours are made by the government and individual can this issue be solved perfectly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ets when commuting. In conclusion, there are manifold reasons for the notio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12621359223 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87323969259 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6785170561 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1764705882 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182554913283 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049161533852 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570255361255 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949331288374 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465084857591 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.