The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity.
There is a school of thought that the success of many companies throughout the world nowadays depend on the perfect performance of their staffs and workers. Nevertheless, its impact on the company's business management brings much controversial debate based on the ways that their boss produced working environment, experience as well as finance for them. This essay will elaborate for the question of what can companies do to raise the employee productivity.
Increasing the efficiency of staff is undisputedly one of the main arrow for the reason that getting the great outcome of association. The first reason to support it is that a great deal of corporation on Earth at present are trying to make lots of good things for the life of workers on a regular basis in order to produce them the comfortable environment for working in their company to increase the performance of them. To illustrate, we can see from many organisations in United Kingdom, a country which is infamous for employed atmosphere, are growing very fast with a special kind of system for staff based on the advantage feeling such as the funds, time-table and accommodation. Therefore, corporation which can deal with this type of aforementioned benefit for their employee, would probably gain more favorable outcome in a foreseeable future.
In the other hand, association should also get some imagination of disadvantage sides which would lead to drop the overall company's productivity when they get a bad outlook in worker's position. It stands to the reason that focusing on the attitude is very significant when we want to have a great deal of performance of employees. Leader, for instance, would always have a failed time-table or the negative attitude to workers is undisputedly the probable point that plumping the employing productivity of them. Moreover, we can see from a particular salient article having been published in Economic Magazine introduced that 80% of organisations which bring a bad life of employing atmosphere for laborer would have 60% of dropping outcome in every aspect. For that reason, if we would prefer the association to have a big success on a regular basis, we should plan the policy including the negative risks which would take a bad outlook of laborers.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that bringing many benefits on funds, time-table and accommodation in a daily basis for working people is greatly significant, the attitude of leader who employed together with them could also be value considerably.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15815085158 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02032431579 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8036443067 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.076923077 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6153846154 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217063160124 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833220772141 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642815093974 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128663065772 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969845151009 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.