Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
How far do you agree?
What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
There is a school of thought that film actors or corporation bosses throughout the world were paid a huge of funds which were out of percentage to the importance of their business, while certain workers such as nurses, doctors as well as teachers are undervalued and need to be paid more. Its impact on the current system of society brings much controversial debate based on many aspects such as achievable profit, social need, educational value as well as the healthcare of human beings. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative sides of these arguments with the criteria for using to decide the value of their job from a cultural perspective.
Providing more finance for the nurses, doctors, teachers or some kinds of those jobs is undisputedly one of the main arrow to improve the quality of educational environment, and make higher opportunity for them to deal with the treatment of rare diseases. The first reason to support it is that despite all the financial profit that we invested in a great number of actors or intelligent CEO, no one can reject the worth of good condition in human life along with the knowledge of offspring when we want to hold the long-term picture. Moreover, we can see from many modern countries on Earth such as Netherlands, a country which is infamous for building a good system in their resident's healthcare, high school and university, have become one of the top countries in the world with a great amount of benefits in many aspects of human life that government brought. Hence, according to the aforementioned reasons, there is no doubt for paying huge money to the people who are laboring with those types of job.
On the other hand, we should also plan a way that making a great amount of money to pay for those inhabitants. It stands to the reason that the essential of financial outcome from artists, film actors and company bosses is probably significant for the development of global society in a regular basis. Furthermore, one particular salient example for these topics having been published by The New York Time Magazine indicated that 95% of intensive learning university brought 80% of successful founder and co-founder of many famous organisation together with the ingenious officers at ministries around the Earth. Additionally, we should focus on the distribution of criteria, if we would have an idea of increasing the salary for these certain workers. Therefore, the amount of knowledge as well as the outcomes in their employment is undisputedly one of the central points for getting an equitable decision to raise their wage.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that the mission to improve the salary between occupations is greatly important, the demand of actors, chief financial officers along with the criteria used to decide the worth of people could also value considerably.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, no doubt, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2384.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00840336134 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80365466595 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533613445378 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1610518851 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.384615385 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6153846154 20.7667163134 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155693259887 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566198987064 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851627495947 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089732461205 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599321309665 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.