A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It has been claimed that in today’s material world, social status and wealthiness represent a person’s value, with abstract ideas like honour, kindness and trust being of less importance. In my personal point of view, I partially agree with this statement, and the reasons for it will be elaborated in this essay.
First of all, today’s materialism implies us that wealthy people dominate our society. The richer we become, the more things we can do and the higher social status we achieve. Thus, it is not uncommon to witness that modern people are constantly striving for physical well-being. Moreover, it is people from upper social class that have gained control over everything. In other words, a person’s success is determined by the social class he comes from. In addition, it is evident that people from lower socioeconomic status are regarded themselves worthless in this society.
On the other hand, there could be a case for saying that inner values have better ability to identify a person. According to the saying, “Honesty is the best policy”, it is essential that people need to be honest to build trust with one another in a great number of things from making friends to dealing businesses. No matter how rich a person is, being dishonest will only bring disgrace to himself and his family. Another value that determines humanity is kindness without which we will be no difference from animals. On top of that it is crucial to have an honourable life regardless of our wealth.
To sum up, in evaluating a person’s worth in our society, it is impossible to leave out those precious inner values besides judgment by social status and material wealth. In fact, the former ones are spiritual strength while the latter ones indicate physical advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, first of all, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82813455322 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4824241698 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24166077063 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744701660087 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588204999909 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152442682493 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069075560509 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.